Higher Theory and the Three Problems of Physics

Por • 28 ene, 2018 • Sección: Leyes

Antti Veilahti

Abstract: According to the Butterfield–Isham proposal, to understand quantum gravity we must revise the way we view the universe of mathematics. However, this paper demonstrates that the current elaborations of this programme neglect quantum interactions. The paper then introduces the Faddeev–Mickelsson anomaly which obstructs the renormalization of Yang–Mills theory, suggesting that to theorise on many-particle systems requires a many-topos view of mathematics itself: higher theory. As our main contribution, the topos theoretic framework is used to conceptualise the fact that there are principally three different quantisation problems, the differences of which have been ignored not just by topos physicists but by most philosophers of science. We further argue that if higher theory proves out to be necessary for understanding quantum gravity, its implications to philosophy will be foundational: higher theory challenges the propositional concept of truth and thus the very meaning of theorising in science.

arXiv:1712.09454v1 [physics.hist-ph]

History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph); Mathematical Physics (math-ph); Category Theory (math.CT); History and Overview (math.HO); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)

Post to Twitter

Escribe un comentario